- Welcome to Mosselbaai Grondeienaars Vereniging (MGEV).
Mosselbaai Grondeienaars-Vereniging (MGEV)
Recent posts
#91
Finansiële Departement - Die Gemeenskap Vra: / Finansies: Gelde Afgeskryf vir...
Last post by Administrator - Jan 10, 2024, 10:51 AMIn die 2022/2023 Finansiële jaar is daar deur die Munisipaliteit R74 miljoen afgeskryf van dienste wat met ons handbediende geld betaal is.
In die state staan:
R73M write-off irrecoverable indigent debtors accounts - following a change in the council's policy.
What is the indigent policy in South Africa?
The Municipal Indigent Policy is intended to guide the national initiative to improve the lives of indigents and to improve access to Free Basic services. It provides a high-level framework to guide the national initiative to improve the lives of the indigent.
Die GROOT misverstand
Die vraag moet nou gevra word voor 1994 was daar nie een "indigent" mense in Mosselbaai nie. Maar is ons en die bruin mense oorspronklik seder die jaar 1488 nie werklik die indigent mense van Mosselbaai nie?
Ons sal die Raadsbesluit wil kry en ook die detail van die adresse van die R74 000 000 wat afgeskryf is.
Datum 12 Januarie 2024
Dankie Eugene vir die Terugvoering oor wat Indigent werklik beteken.
What is the meaning of indigent people?
extremely poor
An indigent person is extremely poor, lacking the basic resources of a normal life. Often the indigent lack not only money but homes. Indigent comes from a Latin word meaning wanting, which we used to use to mean "lacking" and not just to describe desires
Is daar regtig R74 000 000 se waarde van dienste gelewer aan "Uiters Arm" mense van Mosselbaai.
Die MGEV sal graag die detail wil sien van die raadsbesluit en ook die lys van rekeninge van toepassing in die afskrywing?
Meer Inligting oor die Afskrywing sien Hulpverlening
3 Junie 2022 is die artikel hieronder in die Mosselbaai Advertiser gevind. Hulpverlening aan eiendomme wat minder as R125 000 werd is. Die MGEV wil graag sien hoe die huishoudings minder werd as R125 000 dit reg kry om 'n afskrywing van R74 000 000 te regverdig.
Navraag oor die R74 000 000
Sien e-pos aangeheg: 2024-01-18 Opvolg van navrae meer as een jaar uitsraande en afskryf van die R74 000 000
Sien e-pos aangeheg: 2024-01-18 Ontvangs erken van die R74 000 000 afskrywing
In die state staan:
R73M write-off irrecoverable indigent debtors accounts - following a change in the council's policy.
What is the indigent policy in South Africa?
The Municipal Indigent Policy is intended to guide the national initiative to improve the lives of indigents and to improve access to Free Basic services. It provides a high-level framework to guide the national initiative to improve the lives of the indigent.
Die GROOT misverstand
Die vraag moet nou gevra word voor 1994 was daar nie een "indigent" mense in Mosselbaai nie. Maar is ons en die bruin mense oorspronklik seder die jaar 1488 nie werklik die indigent mense van Mosselbaai nie?
Ons sal die Raadsbesluit wil kry en ook die detail van die adresse van die R74 000 000 wat afgeskryf is.
Datum 12 Januarie 2024
Dankie Eugene vir die Terugvoering oor wat Indigent werklik beteken.
What is the meaning of indigent people?
extremely poor
An indigent person is extremely poor, lacking the basic resources of a normal life. Often the indigent lack not only money but homes. Indigent comes from a Latin word meaning wanting, which we used to use to mean "lacking" and not just to describe desires
Is daar regtig R74 000 000 se waarde van dienste gelewer aan "Uiters Arm" mense van Mosselbaai.
Die MGEV sal graag die detail wil sien van die raadsbesluit en ook die lys van rekeninge van toepassing in die afskrywing?
Meer Inligting oor die Afskrywing sien Hulpverlening
3 Junie 2022 is die artikel hieronder in die Mosselbaai Advertiser gevind. Hulpverlening aan eiendomme wat minder as R125 000 werd is. Die MGEV wil graag sien hoe die huishoudings minder werd as R125 000 dit reg kry om 'n afskrywing van R74 000 000 te regverdig.
Navraag oor die R74 000 000
Sien e-pos aangeheg: 2024-01-18 Opvolg van navrae meer as een jaar uitsraande en afskryf van die R74 000 000
Sien e-pos aangeheg: 2024-01-18 Ontvangs erken van die R74 000 000 afskrywing
#92
Algemene probleme en vrae vanuit die Gemeenskap / Water en Rioleerign: Water Voo...
Last post by Administrator - Jan 09, 2024, 01:29 PMSien - AFRIKAANS - SAHRC Water and sanitation - Die gemeenskap se reg tot Water en sanitasie
MGEV oorweeg die Stigting van `n Water Kommitee vir Mosselbaai te stig om meer beheer oor ons water voorsiening te kry - Mosselbaai is nie onder die beste 15 in die Weskaap Sien Artikel aangeheg geskryf op 9 Januarie 2024.
Laai dokument af: The best and worst municipalities for drinking water in every province in South Africa – BusinessTech.pdf
MGEV oorweeg die Stigting van `n Water Kommitee vir Mosselbaai te stig om meer beheer oor ons water voorsiening te kry - Mosselbaai is nie onder die beste 15 in die Weskaap Sien Artikel aangeheg geskryf op 9 Januarie 2024.
Laai dokument af: The best and worst municipalities for drinking water in every province in South Africa – BusinessTech.pdf
#93
Saak 33/2023 - - Eis R64 000 000 Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit verloor saak met koste. / Saak 33/2023 - Eis R64 000 000...
Last post by Administrator - Jan 02, 2024, 12:47 PMMunicipality of Mossel Bay v Steenkamp N.O and Another (33/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 315 (1 December 2023):
Belangrik om te weet die saak se koste gaan eers op die 2023/2024 state wees.
Skakel na die saak
Punte wat saakmaak
1. The applicant (the Municipality) seeks to review its own decision taken
in February 2009 in which it allocated a tender for the building of 3 middle-income
housing projects to its preferred bidder. The matter has a long history but the points
for determination in this review are fairly crisp.
2. The review has its genesis in action proceedings which are pending in
this court under case no 21583/2011 in which the successful tenderer (cited in those
proceedings as the Stone Trade Trust) has sought specific performance from the
Municipality to enforce the contract which was allocated to it, alternatively a claim for
damages in excess of R64m for its alleged loss of profits.
3. On 21 December 2022, and as the parties were preparing to go trial on
13 February 2023, the Municipality put a spanner in the works as it sought to review
the tender allocation which it had made some 13 years earlier. It goes without saying
that, in addition to the merits of the application which is brought as a legality review,
there is the question of unreasonable delay in filing the review
16.7 The Trust (Respondent) was at the relevant time, essentially dormant, insolvent and
incapacitated to execute the tender itself. ST Trade Construction (Pty) Ltd had just been
registered.
It will be immediately noted that the Municipality's stance regarding the party with
whom it contracted was speculative and based on assumption rather than clear and
equivocal.
20. Prins goes on to aver that, based on these facts, the provisions of s217
were breached in the following respects.
"17.1 On a proper construction of the tender in question it is uncertain whether the bidder was
the Trust, ST Trade Construction Pty Ltd or Marblesharp 122 (Pty) Ltd;
17.2 It is uncertain whether the tender was awarded to the Trust or ST Trade Construction
(Pty) Ltd;
17.3 The Trust could and should not have "earned "the 12 points referred to above;
17.4 ST Trade Construction (Pty) Ltd could and should not have earned the preferential
procurement points or the title of the other 10 points;
17.5 Neither of the two entities should or legally could accordingly, have been awarded the
tender;
17.6 Neither of these two entities was earmarked to execute the tender. It was Marblesharp
122 Pty Ltd;
17.7 Neither of these two entities were financially or otherwise competent to duly perform the
obligations arising from the tender;
17.8 Neither of these two entities were properly authorized by resolution, to tender, as
required by the tender documentation. (In this regard: (a) - the Resolution relating to the Trust
(Respondent) was: not legally valid and - in any event did not authorize the submission of the11
tender; (b) - No resolution at all authorized a tender on the half of ST Trade Construction in
respect of the proposed development."
21. In the answering affidavit the Trust claims that the stance adopted by
the Municipality is cynical and singularly lacking in good faith. It suggests that the real
purpose of the review is to stall the trial action, given that the Municipality has known
since at least the days of the ASLA review what the Trust's case is, and in particular
how the relationship between the Trust and the JV was established and how it was
intended to function.
23. But before this restructuring could be implemented, says Steenkamp
Jnr, the Trust took the first step in the tender process when it submitted its Expression
of Interest document to the Municipality. That was in November 2007 when the
business was still conducted through the vehicle of the Trust which used the trading
name Stone Trade Trust Construction and, as I have said, was sometimes
abbreviated with the acronym STTC.
27. These documents passed through a host of hands and were scrutinized
by several officials evaluating the various tenders on behalf of the Municipality. These
would have been officials very alive to the spectre of "fronting" which is anathema to
the provisions of s2175. Included in those officials was Prins, the Municipality's legal
head. And yet, none of them had any difficulty in understanding the proposed
structure of the tender, the execution of the works or with which entities they were
dealing. The claim now by the very same Prins that there was uncertainty as to whom
the tender was awarded is both astonishing and absurd. The tender was awarded to
the Trust and everybody knew that – both at the time of the award of the tender and
later during the ASLA review.
28. Counsel for the Municipality queried why the tender document was
lodged by the Trust while ST Trade was described in the JV as "Contractor 1". That of
5 Esorfranki Pipelines (Pty) Ltd and another v Mopani District Municipality and others [2014] 2 All SA
493 (SCA) at [26]13
course is a question which might have been asked by the Municipality at the
evaluation stage, if it was confused or concerned about what the relationship was
between the Trust and the JV. But it did not do so – obviously it did not require clarity
on the point.
29. In that regard, it is important to note that in the bid document the Trust
expressly informed the Municipality that it would be "roping in" a BEE partner and that
the construction work would be performed by the JV through the vehicle of
Marblesharp. Further, the customary scoring of BEE points in the tender process was
based on Mbobs' shareholding in Marblesharp. Everything appears to have been
above board and none of the Municipality's sub-committees found fault with the bid.
30. As demonstrated in para 8 above, the decision of the Municipality's
Council in awarding the tender was that it should go to "Stone Trade Trust
[Marblesharp 122 (Pty)]". The incomplete reference to Marblesharp in parentheses
indicates unequivocally that the Municipality recognized that entity's association with
the Trust in relation to the tender but that the party to whom the tender was granted
was the Trust.
31. Clearly, it did not bother the municipal officials how the Trust structured
its affairs through the use of an eponymous company as "Contractor 1" in establishing
the JV with Mbobs. In argument, the Court asked Mr. van Riet whether there was any
authority on the interpretation of s217 which established that, in a situation where an
entity had been awarded a contract by an organ of state, it was precluded by that
section of the Constitution from rearranging its corporate affairs or structure for
purposes of its own business efficiency in such a way that, for example, a wholly
owned subsidiary was established to perform part (or all) of its obligations under the
contract. Counsel was not aware of any such authority at the time and has not drawn
anything to the Court's attention subsequent to the hearing notwithstanding an
invitation to do so.14
CONCLUSION
32. On the evidence presented in the affidavits in this matter, I am unable to
find that the Municipality has established conclusively that the contract in question
falls foul of the provisions of s217 and that it must thus be set aside. It was fair,
Transparent, equitable, competitive and evidently cost-effective. It follows that the
review must fail.
33. As regards costs, Mr. Vivier urged the Court to grant the Trust a punitive
costs order in light of the cynical and mala fide way in which it has approached the
court to save its bacon in the damages claim. In my view, there is certainly merit in
what counsel submitted but I consider that there is a more appropriate way to grant
such a costs order. In the oft quoted decision of Alluvial Creek6 almost a century ago
in this Division Gardiner JP held as follows.
ORDER OF COURT
Accordingly, it is ordered that:
A. The application for review is dismissed.
B. The applicant is to pay the costs of the first and second
respondent, in their representative capacity as trustees of the
Stone Trade Trust, on the scale as between attorney and client.
__________________
Belangrik om te weet die saak se koste gaan eers op die 2023/2024 state wees.
Skakel na die saak
Punte wat saakmaak
1. The applicant (the Municipality) seeks to review its own decision taken
in February 2009 in which it allocated a tender for the building of 3 middle-income
housing projects to its preferred bidder. The matter has a long history but the points
for determination in this review are fairly crisp.
2. The review has its genesis in action proceedings which are pending in
this court under case no 21583/2011 in which the successful tenderer (cited in those
proceedings as the Stone Trade Trust) has sought specific performance from the
Municipality to enforce the contract which was allocated to it, alternatively a claim for
damages in excess of R64m for its alleged loss of profits.
3. On 21 December 2022, and as the parties were preparing to go trial on
13 February 2023, the Municipality put a spanner in the works as it sought to review
the tender allocation which it had made some 13 years earlier. It goes without saying
that, in addition to the merits of the application which is brought as a legality review,
there is the question of unreasonable delay in filing the review
16.7 The Trust (Respondent) was at the relevant time, essentially dormant, insolvent and
incapacitated to execute the tender itself. ST Trade Construction (Pty) Ltd had just been
registered.
It will be immediately noted that the Municipality's stance regarding the party with
whom it contracted was speculative and based on assumption rather than clear and
equivocal.
20. Prins goes on to aver that, based on these facts, the provisions of s217
were breached in the following respects.
"17.1 On a proper construction of the tender in question it is uncertain whether the bidder was
the Trust, ST Trade Construction Pty Ltd or Marblesharp 122 (Pty) Ltd;
17.2 It is uncertain whether the tender was awarded to the Trust or ST Trade Construction
(Pty) Ltd;
17.3 The Trust could and should not have "earned "the 12 points referred to above;
17.4 ST Trade Construction (Pty) Ltd could and should not have earned the preferential
procurement points or the title of the other 10 points;
17.5 Neither of the two entities should or legally could accordingly, have been awarded the
tender;
17.6 Neither of these two entities was earmarked to execute the tender. It was Marblesharp
122 Pty Ltd;
17.7 Neither of these two entities were financially or otherwise competent to duly perform the
obligations arising from the tender;
17.8 Neither of these two entities were properly authorized by resolution, to tender, as
required by the tender documentation. (In this regard: (a) - the Resolution relating to the Trust
(Respondent) was: not legally valid and - in any event did not authorize the submission of the11
tender; (b) - No resolution at all authorized a tender on the half of ST Trade Construction in
respect of the proposed development."
21. In the answering affidavit the Trust claims that the stance adopted by
the Municipality is cynical and singularly lacking in good faith. It suggests that the real
purpose of the review is to stall the trial action, given that the Municipality has known
since at least the days of the ASLA review what the Trust's case is, and in particular
how the relationship between the Trust and the JV was established and how it was
intended to function.
23. But before this restructuring could be implemented, says Steenkamp
Jnr, the Trust took the first step in the tender process when it submitted its Expression
of Interest document to the Municipality. That was in November 2007 when the
business was still conducted through the vehicle of the Trust which used the trading
name Stone Trade Trust Construction and, as I have said, was sometimes
abbreviated with the acronym STTC.
27. These documents passed through a host of hands and were scrutinized
by several officials evaluating the various tenders on behalf of the Municipality. These
would have been officials very alive to the spectre of "fronting" which is anathema to
the provisions of s2175. Included in those officials was Prins, the Municipality's legal
head. And yet, none of them had any difficulty in understanding the proposed
structure of the tender, the execution of the works or with which entities they were
dealing. The claim now by the very same Prins that there was uncertainty as to whom
the tender was awarded is both astonishing and absurd. The tender was awarded to
the Trust and everybody knew that – both at the time of the award of the tender and
later during the ASLA review.
28. Counsel for the Municipality queried why the tender document was
lodged by the Trust while ST Trade was described in the JV as "Contractor 1". That of
5 Esorfranki Pipelines (Pty) Ltd and another v Mopani District Municipality and others [2014] 2 All SA
493 (SCA) at [26]13
course is a question which might have been asked by the Municipality at the
evaluation stage, if it was confused or concerned about what the relationship was
between the Trust and the JV. But it did not do so – obviously it did not require clarity
on the point.
29. In that regard, it is important to note that in the bid document the Trust
expressly informed the Municipality that it would be "roping in" a BEE partner and that
the construction work would be performed by the JV through the vehicle of
Marblesharp. Further, the customary scoring of BEE points in the tender process was
based on Mbobs' shareholding in Marblesharp. Everything appears to have been
above board and none of the Municipality's sub-committees found fault with the bid.
30. As demonstrated in para 8 above, the decision of the Municipality's
Council in awarding the tender was that it should go to "Stone Trade Trust
[Marblesharp 122 (Pty)]". The incomplete reference to Marblesharp in parentheses
indicates unequivocally that the Municipality recognized that entity's association with
the Trust in relation to the tender but that the party to whom the tender was granted
was the Trust.
31. Clearly, it did not bother the municipal officials how the Trust structured
its affairs through the use of an eponymous company as "Contractor 1" in establishing
the JV with Mbobs. In argument, the Court asked Mr. van Riet whether there was any
authority on the interpretation of s217 which established that, in a situation where an
entity had been awarded a contract by an organ of state, it was precluded by that
section of the Constitution from rearranging its corporate affairs or structure for
purposes of its own business efficiency in such a way that, for example, a wholly
owned subsidiary was established to perform part (or all) of its obligations under the
contract. Counsel was not aware of any such authority at the time and has not drawn
anything to the Court's attention subsequent to the hearing notwithstanding an
invitation to do so.14
CONCLUSION
32. On the evidence presented in the affidavits in this matter, I am unable to
find that the Municipality has established conclusively that the contract in question
falls foul of the provisions of s217 and that it must thus be set aside. It was fair,
Transparent, equitable, competitive and evidently cost-effective. It follows that the
review must fail.
33. As regards costs, Mr. Vivier urged the Court to grant the Trust a punitive
costs order in light of the cynical and mala fide way in which it has approached the
court to save its bacon in the damages claim. In my view, there is certainly merit in
what counsel submitted but I consider that there is a more appropriate way to grant
such a costs order. In the oft quoted decision of Alluvial Creek6 almost a century ago
in this Division Gardiner JP held as follows.
ORDER OF COURT
Accordingly, it is ordered that:
A. The application for review is dismissed.
B. The applicant is to pay the costs of the first and second
respondent, in their representative capacity as trustees of the
Stone Trade Trust, on the scale as between attorney and client.
__________________
#94
Regskoste uit die Finansiële state / Regskoste van 2012/13 tot 2022...
Last post by Administrator - Jan 02, 2024, 12:37 PM| Finansiële Jaarstate | Kontrakteurs Personeel uitgesluit | Notas oor die koste | Versoeke van MGEV |
| 2022/2023 | R13 420 970 (bl 154) 154% op | Vereffeningskoste | Saaknommer word versoek |
| 2021/2022 | R5 276 197 (bl 164) 29% op | Geen Notas | Hoekom so baie op |
| 2020/2021 | R4 092 194 (bl 149) 44% op | Geen Notas | Hoekom so baie op |
| 2019/2020 | R2 837 654 (bl 141) 16% af | Geen Notas | Geen Versoek |
| 2018/2019 | R3 391 290 (bl 120) 49% op | Geen Notas | Hoekom so baie op |
| 2017/2018 | R2 269 682 (bl 118) 160% op | Geen Notas | Hoekom so baie op |
| 2016/2017 | R873 590 (bl 122) 54% af | Geen Notas | Geen Versoek |
| 2015/2016 | R1 908 036 (bl 124) 136% op | Seemeeu Park Grond (bl 144) | Verstaanbaar Groot Probleem |
| 2014/2015 | R808 857 (bl 111) 3% af | Geen Notas | Geen Versoek |
| 2013/2014 | R831 584 (bl 106) 10% af | Geen Notas | Geen Versoek |
| 2012/2013 | R920 744 (bl 102) | Geen Notas | Geen Versoek |
Sien die hofuitspraak 1 Desember 2023 R64 000 000 eis plus koste teen Munisipaliteit:
https://mgev.co.za/index.php?topic=21.0
Die fout gaan die Mosselbaaiers baie geld uit die sak jaag in die 2023/2024 Finansiële jaar.
#95
Vyfde Groep Self Bestuur Forums Nommer 81-100 / Vyfde Groep Self Bestuur Forum...
Last post by Administrator - Oct 27, 2022, 07:02 PMGroep Vyfde Self Bestuur Forums kan moontlik soos volg opgedeel word:
Aangheg is 20 Kaarte wat die ligging van elke een van die vyfde groep 20 SBF's aandui .
SBF's die Derde groep van vyf begin SBF 81 tot 100 die gebied begin by Ruitersbosch Bosbou berglangs tot by Herbertsdale. Hierdie Groep is die laaste groep van 5 maar daar is baie gebiede nog nie ingsluit nie net tyd sal leer hoeveel SBF daar in Mosselbaai Munisipalegebied gaan wees die gemeenskappe gaan self bepaal.
Aangheg is 20 Kaarte wat die ligging van elke een van die vyfde groep 20 SBF's aandui .
SBF's die Derde groep van vyf begin SBF 81 tot 100 die gebied begin by Ruitersbosch Bosbou berglangs tot by Herbertsdale. Hierdie Groep is die laaste groep van 5 maar daar is baie gebiede nog nie ingsluit nie net tyd sal leer hoeveel SBF daar in Mosselbaai Munisipalegebied gaan wees die gemeenskappe gaan self bepaal.
- Ruitersbosch Bosbou - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Ruitersberg tot by Moerderskop Plase - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Herbertsdale - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ?? - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
#96
Vierde Groep Self Bestuur Forums Nommer 61-80 / Vierde Groep Self Bestuur Foru...
Last post by Administrator - Oct 27, 2022, 07:01 PMGroep Vier Self Bestuur Forums kan moontlik soos volg opgedeel word:
Aangheg is 20 Kaarte wat die ligging van elke een van die vierde groep 20 SBF's aandui .
SBF's die Derde groep van vyf begin SBF 61 tot 80 die gebied begin by Grootbrak - De Dekke tot by Ruitersbosch.
Aangheg is 20 Kaarte wat die ligging van elke een van die vierde groep 20 SBF's aandui .
SBF's die Derde groep van vyf begin SBF 61 tot 80 die gebied begin by Grootbrak - De Dekke tot by Ruitersbosch.
- Grootbrak - De Dekke - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Grootbrak Dorp - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Grootbrak Groenkloof Estate - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Rheebok Industries - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Grootbrak Greenhaven - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Grootbrak Wolwedans - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Grootbrak Plotte - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Grootbrak Lagoondale - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Grootbrak Die Eiland - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Grootbrak Dolphins Creek Golf Estate - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Grootbrak Hersham - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Bothastrand - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Dwarswegstrand - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Outeniqua Strand - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Glentana - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Jonkersberg Plase - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Botlierskop Plase - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Friemersheim - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Brandwacht en Hartenbos Plase - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Ruitersbosch - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
#97
Derde Groep Self Bestuur Forums Nommer 41-60 / Derde Groep Self Bestuur Forum...
Last post by Administrator - Oct 25, 2022, 01:36 PMGroep Drie Self Bestuur Forums kan moontlik soos volg opgedeel word:
Aangheg is 20 Kaarte wat die ligging van elke een van die derde groep 20 SBF's aandui .
SBF's die Derde groep van vyf begin SBF 41 tot 60 die gebied begin by Num Num tot by Suiderkruis Kus en N2 langs.
Aangheg is 20 Kaarte wat die ligging van elke een van die derde groep 20 SBF's aandui .
SBF's die Derde groep van vyf begin SBF 41 tot 60 die gebied begin by Num Num tot by Suiderkruis Kus en N2 langs.
- Num Num - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Seemeeeu Park - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Bay View - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Innikol, Deonville Park en Fonteine Park - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Menkenkop - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Hartenbos - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Hartenbos Die Heuwels - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Hartenbos Oewer Oorde - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Sonskyn - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Monte Christo - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Brandwag - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Outeniqua Bosch - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Hartland - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Riverside - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Klein Brak Rivier - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Fraaiuitsig - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Reebok - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Tergniet - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Vogelsang - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Suiderkruis - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
#98
Tweede Groep Self Bestuur Forums Nommer 21-40 / Tweede Groep Self Bestuur Foru...
Last post by Administrator - Oct 25, 2022, 01:31 PMGroep twee Self Bestuur Forums kan moontlik soos volg opgedeel word:Aangheg is 20 Kaarte wat ligging van elke een van die tweede 20 SBF's aandui .SBF's die eerste groep van vyf begin SBF 21 tot 40 die gebied begin by Mosselbaai Sentraal tot by Aalwyndal
- Mosselbaai Sentraal - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Mosselbaai Die Skiereieland Die Punt - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Mosselbaai Santos De Bakke - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Da Nova - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- D'Almeida - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Fairview - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Isazane - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Isinyoka - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Boplaas - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Mosselbaai Uitbreiding 26 - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Kwanonqaba - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Kwanonqaba Uitbreiding 1 - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- N2 Industrial - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Boland Park - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Diaz Strand - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Diaz Industria - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Vakansie Plaas - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Island View - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Voorbaai - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Aalwyndal - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
#99
Eerste Groep Self Bestuur Forums Nommer 1-20 / Eerste Groep Self Bestuur Foru...
Last post by Administrator - Oct 23, 2022, 09:28 AMGroep een Self Bestuur Forums kan moontlik soos volg opgedeel word:
Aangheg is 'n 20 Kaarte wat ligging van elke een van die eeste 20 SBF's aandui.
SBF's die eerste groep van vyf begin SBF 1 tot 20 die gebied begin by Gouritz Kuslangs tot by die Mosselbaai Golfbaan Landgoed
Aangheg is 'n 20 Kaarte wat ligging van elke een van die eeste 20 SBF's aandui.
SBF's die eerste groep van vyf begin SBF 1 tot 20 die gebied begin by Gouritz Kuslangs tot by die Mosselbaai Golfbaan Landgoed
- Gouritz Dorp - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Gouritz Plase - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Kanon - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Johnson's Post - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Buffelsfontein Plase - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Kleinberg Plase - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Vleesbaai - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Boggomsbaai - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Springerbaai - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Nautilusbaai - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Petro SA - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Moquini Landgoed - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Mossdustria - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- ReedValley Plase - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Danabaai - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Pinnacle Point Landgoed - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Mosselbaai Remainder - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Heiderand - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Village On Sea - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
- Mosselbaai Golf Estate - Voorgestelde Kaart Aangeheg
#100
Voorgestelde Self Bestuur Forums (SBF's) In die Mosselbaai munisipale gebied / Mosselbaai kan in 80 to 100 of...
Last post by Administrator - Oct 21, 2022, 08:54 PMDink 'n bietjie daaroor hoe kan iemand wat in Kwanonqaba bly 'n besluit neem oor die klagtes wat uit Gouritz of Hersham kom. Daar moet 'n nuwe sisteem in plek kom wat vir Gouritz of Hersham se mense ken wat inwoners se klagtes namens die Munisipale sektor hanteer en bestuur. Daardie liggaam of sisteem kan deur die nuwe Self Bestuur Forum (SBF) van Gouritz of Hersham gedoen word daar waar die probleem is.
Die totale bedienings oppervlakte van Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit is +/- 2100km2, wat dit ontoereikend maak vir effektiewe dienslewering. In hierdie opsig moet ons as eienaars direk betrokke raak. Die Gemeenskaps Polisiërings Forum is 'n goeie model, wat reeds bewys is.
Die tegniese verskille tussen GPF (CPF) en GVF (CSF) – Gemeenskaps Veiligheids Forum dui daarop dat beide wel geskik is vir die bestuur van veiligheids aspekte, maar nie noodwendig vir gemeenskaps dienslewerings projekte nie.
Die Mosselbaai Self Bestuur Forums kan moontlik in dienslewering 'n groot rol speel die SBF kan soos volg opgedeel word:
Aangheg is 'n Kaart van die Mosselbaai Munisipale Gebied 2011m2 in totaal.
Klik op die skakel hieronder om die detail van elke gebied te sien Let daarop 'n nuwe "TAB" word oopgemaak vir elke gebied.
Voorgestelde Gebied 1 kaarte - 01-20
Voorgestelde Gebied 2 kaarte - 21-40
Voorgestelde Gebied 3 kaarte - 41-60
Voorgestelde Gebied 4 kaarte - 61-80
Voorgestelde Gebied 5 kaarte - 81-100
Die totale bedienings oppervlakte van Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit is +/- 2100km2, wat dit ontoereikend maak vir effektiewe dienslewering. In hierdie opsig moet ons as eienaars direk betrokke raak. Die Gemeenskaps Polisiërings Forum is 'n goeie model, wat reeds bewys is.
Die tegniese verskille tussen GPF (CPF) en GVF (CSF) – Gemeenskaps Veiligheids Forum dui daarop dat beide wel geskik is vir die bestuur van veiligheids aspekte, maar nie noodwendig vir gemeenskaps dienslewerings projekte nie.
Die Mosselbaai Self Bestuur Forums kan moontlik in dienslewering 'n groot rol speel die SBF kan soos volg opgedeel word:
Aangheg is 'n Kaart van die Mosselbaai Munisipale Gebied 2011m2 in totaal.
Klik op die skakel hieronder om die detail van elke gebied te sien Let daarop 'n nuwe "TAB" word oopgemaak vir elke gebied.
Voorgestelde Gebied 1 kaarte - 01-20
Voorgestelde Gebied 2 kaarte - 21-40
Voorgestelde Gebied 3 kaarte - 41-60
Voorgestelde Gebied 4 kaarte - 61-80
Voorgestelde Gebied 5 kaarte - 81-100